اشكالية توصيف الإبادة: قراءة في تقنيات الاتجاهات التاريخية لتفسير الابادة اليهودية


  • Haider Shakir Sultani
  • ORCID:


The research is an attempt designed to diagnose the problematic of
characterizing the genocide by adopting the "Holocaust" as a paradigm for
the hypothesis addressed by the research, reviewing the trends of historians'
interpretation of the genocide since the end of World War II (1945), as well
as tracking the historical stations that those interpretations have gone
through, the problems and crises that they provoked in Germany, and the
response of German historical circles for the challenge imposed by those
interpretations. The research is divided into two topics: the first: The
Historians' Trends in Interpreting the Nazi Genocide of the Jews until
the 1980s. As for the second: the "Holocaust" Historiography, the Nazi
Knot, and the Identity Crisis in Germany.


ع Documents 1. (1946). Documents of T. G. M. W. C. (Trial of German Major War Criminals Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany), London: His Majesty's Stationery Office. Vol. I. الكتب بالمغة العربية ٔ. ارند س حنة. )ٕٛٔٓ(. ايخماف ف القدس: تضاىة الشرس ترجمة احمد زعزعس بيرو : دار الااق . ٕ. روشنينغس ىيرماف. )ٜٔٗٔ(. ىتمر يريد العالـس ترجمة ـ. حبيعس بغداد: مطبعة الجزيرة. ٖ. ريكورس بوؿ. )ٜٕٓٓ(. الذاكرةس التاريخس النايافس ترجمة جورج زينات س بيرو : دار الكتاع الجديد المتحدة. ٗ. غاروديس روجيو. )ٜٜٚٔ(. األااطير المؤااة لمايااة اإلارائيميةس ترجمة حافظ الجمػال وصػياح الجييـس طٖس بيرو : دار عطية لمنشر. البحوث بالمغة العربية ٘. الاػمطان س حيػدر شػاكر عبيػد. )كػانوف االوؿ ٜٕٔٓ(. المقتةػيا االقتصػادية لمعاػكرا االعتقػاؿ النازية: قرا ة تاريخية ف اشكالية مضيوـ برنامج "الحؿ النيائ ٕٜٗٔ" وتطبيقاتو. مجمة كمية اآلداع )جامعة بغداد(س العدد ٖٔٔ. ٘ٚٔ-ٕٙٓ. ٙ. طحطحس خالد. )تموز ٕٙٔٓ(. االاتغرافية االلمانية وعقدة النازيػة.س مجمػة ااػطورس العػدد ٗ. ٜٔ- .ٔٓٛ ٚ. ليضػ س جيوفػان . )ٕٓٔٓ(. عػف التػاريخ المصػغر. فػ : بيتػر يػورك )تحريػر(س نظػرا جديػدة عمػى الكتابة التاريخيةس ترجمة قااـ عبده قااـس القاىرةس المركز القوم لمترجمة )امامة العموـ االجتماعية لمباح يفس العدد ٜٔ٘ٔ(. ٜٖٔ – ٘ٙٔ. Books 1. Aly, Götz. (1999). Final Solution: Nazi Population Policy and the Murder of the European Jews. London: Hodder Headline Group. 2. Anonymous. (1969). The Myth of the Six Million. California: The Noontid Press. htpp//www.ihr.org. 3. Browning, Christopher R. (1998). Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland, London, Penguin Group. 4. Gilbert, Martin. (1986). The Holocaust: A History of the Jews of Europe during the Second World War. New York: Rinehart and Winston. 5. Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. (1996). Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York. No. Pub. 6. Harwood, R., & Zündel, E. (1982). Did Six Million Really Die?. Institute for Historical Review. 7. Hilberg, Raul.(1961). The Destruction of the European Jews. London: W H Allen. 8. Hoggan, David L.(1989). The Forced War When Peaceful Revision Failed. USA. Institute for Historical Review. 9. Poliakov, Léon. (1954). Harvest of Hate: The Nazi Program for the Destruction of Jews in Europe. New York: Syracuse University Press. 26 10. Rassinier, Paul. (1975). The Drama of the European Jews. Maryland: Steppingstones Publications. 11. Rassinier, Paul. (1978). Debunking the Genocide Myth, A Study of the Nazi Concentration Camps and the Alleged Extermination of European Jewry, Tran. by Adam Robbins, Los Angeles: The Noontide Press. 12. Schwab, Gerald. (1990). The Day The Holocaust Began: Odyssey of Hershel Grynszpan. New York: No. Pub. 13. Schleunes, Karl A. (1970). The Twisted Road to Auschwitz: Nazi Policy toward German Jews, 1933-1939, Chicago, University of Illinois Press. 14. Snyder, Louis L. (1998). Encyclopedia of The Third Reich. London: Wordsworth Editions. 3rd edition. 15. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. (1988). Entsorgung der deutschen Vergangenheit? Ein polemischer Essay zum 'Historikerstreit". München: Verlag C. H. Beck. 16. Welch, S. (2001). A Survey of Interpretive Paradigms in Holocaust Studies and a Comment on the Dimensions of the Holocaust.Yale Uni: Genocide Studies Program. www.yale.edu/gsp. Researches 1. Bauer, Yehuda. (Jan.-Apr.1997). 'On Perpetrators of the Holocaust and the Public Discourse: Hitler's Willing Executioners by Daniel J. Goldhagen'. The Jewish Quarterly Review, (87).3/4. 343-350 2. Berg, Friedrich Paul. (1988). 'Typhus and the Jews'. The Journal of Historical Review, (8) 4. 450-481. 3. Bessel, Richard. (Feb. 2003). 'Functionalists vs Intentionalists: The Debate Twenty Years On or Whatever Happened to Functionalism and Intentionalism?'. German Studies Review. (26)1. 15-20. 4. Brandon, Lewis. (1980). 'The Mendacity of Zion'. The Journal of Historical Review, (1) 2. 147ff. 5. Breitman, Richard. (1992). The "Final Solution'. in: Gordon Martel (ed.). Modern Germany, Reconsidered 1870-1945, London: Routledge. 197-210. 6. Browning, C. R. (2004). The decision-making process. In The historiography of the Holocaust. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 173-196. 7. Butler, R. A. (January 2014). The Goose-Step is Only Functional for Geese: Perspective on the Intentionalist/Functionalist Debate on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, and its Implications for Humanity‟s Advancement through Modernity", History in the Making. 7(7). 45-64. 8. Consoli, Mario. (1996). Why the Holocaust Must Remain a Dogma ", The Journal of Historical Review. 4(41). 36ff 9. Everett, Annie. (2015). The Genesis of the Sonderweg," International Social Science Review. 91( 2) Article 1. 1-37. 10. Faurisson, Robert, "The Problem of the Gas Chambers ", The Journal of Historical. 1(2). 1980. 103-111. 11. Faurisson, Robert. (1981). Confessions of SS Men Who Were at Auschwitz. The Journal of Historical Review. 2(2). 103-121. 12. Faurisson, Robert. (1981). The Gas Chambers: Truth or Lie? Questions by Antonio Pitamitz To Robert Faurisson", Translated by Vivian Bird, The Journal of Historical Review. 2(2). 319-373. 13. Felderer, Ditlieb. (1980). Auschwitz Notebook More Impossibilities of the: Gerstein Statement. The Journal of Historical Review. 1(2).169-172. 27 14. Föllmer, M. (2013). “The Subjective Dimension of Nazism”, Historical Journal, Vol. (56).4. 1107- 1132. 15. Hankins, Frank H. (1983). "How Many Jews Were Eliminated by the Nazis? A Preliminary Survey of the Question", The Journal of Historical Review, (4) 1. 61-81. 16. Hilberg, R. (1997). The Goldhagen Phenomenon. Critical Inquiry, 23(4), 721-728. 17. Kalekin-Fishman, D. (2013). Sociology of everyday life. Current Sociology, 61(5-6), 714-732. 18. Bergerson, A. S., Koslov, E. M., Reuveni, G., Steege, P., & Sweeney, D. (2009). Everyday Life in Nazi Germany. German History, 27 (4). 560-579 19. Kott, Sandrine. (2010). 'Alltagsgeschichte'. In: Delacroix, C., Dosse, F., Garcia, P., & Offenstadt, N. Historiographies. Concepts et débats . Parise: Gallimard. 21-28. 20. Kracht, K. G.. (2010). “Debatte: Der Historikerstreit” in: DocupediaZeitgeschichte.http://docupedia.de/zg/kracht_historikerstreit_v1_de_2010 . 1-12 21. Kwiet, Konrad. (1996/1997)."Goldhagen, the Germans, and the Holocaust", Journal of Jewish Affairs. (133). 7–39. 22. Kwiet, K. (2000). „Hitler‟s Willing Executioners‟ and „Ordinary Germans‟: Some Comments on Goldhagen‟s Ideas. Jewish Studies Yearbook, 1. 23. Mason, T. (1981). Intention and explanation: A current controversy about the interpretation of National Socialism. in: Gerhard Hirschfeld and Lothar Kettenacker (eds.), Der "Fiihrerstaat." Mythos und Realitat. Studien zur Struktur und Politik des Dritten Reiches, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta,. 3- 20. 24. Mattogno, C. (1989). The First Gassino at Auschwitz: Genesis of a Myth. The Journal of Historical Review. (9)2. 193-222. 25. Mattogno, C. (1988). "The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews: Part I", The Journal of Historical Review.(8) 2. 133-172. 26. Moses, A. D. (1998). Structure and agency in the Holocaust: Daniel J. Goldhagen and his critics. History and Theory, 37(2), 194-219. 27. Nolan, M. (1988). “The Historikerstreit and Social History”, New German Critique, (44) Special Issue on the Historikerstreit. 51-80. 28. O'Keefe, T. J. (1991). "Why Holocaust Revisionism?". The Journal of Historical Review. (12) 1. 99-108. 29. O'Keefe, Theodore J., " Made in Russia: The Holocaust: Book Reviews”, The Journal of Historical Review. (9) 1. 89-92. 30. Port, Andrew I. (2015). History from Below, the History of Everyday Life, and Microhistory. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, USA, Elsevier Ltd. (11). 108-113. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.62156-6. 31. Staglich, W. (1986). "Historians Wrangle over the Destruction of European Jewry ", The Journal of Historical Review. (7) 2. 239-244. 32. Weber, M. (1992). The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Journal of Historical Review, 12(2), 167-213. 33. Weber, M. (1985). Rauschning's phony conversations with Hitler: an update. The Journal of historical Review. 6(4). 499-515. 28 34. Weber, M. (1988). West Germany‟s Holocaust Payoff to Israel and World Jewry. The Journal of Historical Review, 8(2), 243-250. 35. Weber, M. (1992). The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Journal of Historical Review. 12(2). 167-213. 36. Wicke, C. (2014). 'Between German and eternal spirit: Kohl‟s politics of historical memory in biographical perspective'. Moving the Social. 52. 139- 170. 37. Zimmermann, Moshe. (2016). "Hans Mommsen (1930–2015) A History of Cumulative Radicalization", Translated from Hebrew by Naftali Greenwood. Yad Vashem Studies. (44) 1. Theses 1. Ashworth, J. (2011). Between Evidence and Symbol: The Auschwitz Album in Yad Vashem, the Imperial War Museum (London) and the AuschwitzBirkenau State Museum (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton). 1-307. 2. Irvin-Erickson, D. (2014). The life and works of Raphael Lemkin: a political history of genocide in theory and law (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School-Newark). 1-467. 3. Nugent, C. R. (2010). German Vergangenheitsbewältigung, 1961-1999: Selected Historiographic Controversies and Their Impact on National Identity1961 – 1999. (Doctoral dissertation, Western Carolina University). 7-180. Articals 1. Broszat, M. (3 Oktober,1986). 'Wo sich die Geister scheiden'. Die Zeit, 3. 2. Dickstein, M. (January 28, 2001).Sounds of Silence: A Holocaust Historian Examines the Challenge of Writing about the Nazi Genocide. The New York Times. 3. Habermas, J. (1986). Eine Art Schadensabwicklung. Die apologetischen Tendenzen in der deutschen Zeitgeschichtsschreibung. Die Zeit, 11(1986), 62-76. 4. (12/11/2015) “Hans Mommsen Obituary: Historian Who Confronted Germany with a New and Challenging interpretation of its Nazi past”, The Guardian. 5. Hilberg, R. (2007). 'Is there a new anti-Semitism? A conversation with Raul Hilberg'. Logos. (6). 6. Nolte, E. (6. Juni 1986). 'Vergangenheit, die nicht vergehen will'. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 6. 7. Roberts, Sam. (Aug. 19, 2016). 'Ernst Nolte, Historian Who's Views on Hitler Caused an Uproar, Dies at 93'. The New York Time. 8. Russell, Gail. (March 4, 1988). 'How the Hitler Myth Took Hold in Germany. Manipulating masses'. The Christian Science Monitor